2.20 EUR A cause of action?
The Mannheimer Morgen reported differentiated. Sure, it's annoying when small amounts are blocked because precious judicial resources. On the other hand, the head of the civil departments at the district court of Heidelberg, the right answer:
But a "minimum price" do not know the court. "That's a good thing, because otherwise you could just get the idea, more and 2.10 euros too much into account," Kretz describes vividly the top rule of law.
Or the other way around, what I do as a biller if the customers pay 5.00 EUR fundamentally less, identified as? The state's monopoly means that anyone who feels their rights have been violated, may impose only those with government help. Then the state but also provide the necessary infrastructure.
In criminal law, there are examples of the way , which put the tax payer to the head wants.
Now finally, a note: If a dispute
values up to 300 EUR provides a common statement according to the RVG something like this:
business fee 1.3 32.50 EUR 32.50
method fee 1.3 EUR 0.65
be counted -16.25 EUR 30.00 EUR 1.2
appointment fee
estimated shipping cost 20 00 EUR
Total net
98.75 EUR 18.67 EUR 19% VAT
total gross ; 117.52 EUR 75.00 EUR
addition coming to the court costs.
That is, who is leading a legal battle to sum up to 300.00 a cost risk goes up to 310.00 EUR in a downstream trap. These are the normal costs. If there are also costs for copies, travel, being away money, witness and expert witnesses add, move rapidly in a range from 500.00 to 1000.00 EUR.
Whether there is worthwhile to have some legal quarrel, is another matter. It is not always an argument going from 100% to 0%. For each cost apportionment, there are really only two losers.
0 comments:
Post a Comment